The construction casualty insurance market across Asia remains largely stable in 2025, according to Aon’s Global Construction Insurance and Surety Market Report. However, regional differences continue to shape market conditions, with some areas experiencing premium reductions while others face hardening rates.
Capacity among reinsurers is generally sufficient, with risk-adjusted rate reductions ranging from flat to minus 10% for non-US exposures. Meanwhile, projects involving US exposures are subject to tighter scrutiny and reduced coverage limits, reflecting heightened risk concerns.
Softer markets such as Korea and China are more likely to see premium declines, while Japan’s insurance market continues to harden due to increased demand and risk factors.
Asia’s major construction projects—spanning hospitals, factories, and data centers—are growing larger and more complex, often resulting in longer completion times. Projects exceeding ten years in duration or those with defect liability periods longer than two years are increasingly difficult to insure.
Renewable energy developments, particularly in solar and wind sectors, are drawing growing interest from reinsurers. However, battery energy storage systems (BESS), especially those with US exposure or third-party manufacturing, remain challenging to insure due to their inherent risks.
Local management of workers’ compensation and auto liability insurance is common in markets like Vietnam and Thailand, reflecting regional regulatory frameworks and operational preferences. In India, regulatory reforms are encouraging more international insurers to enter the market, notably supporting solar farm projects.
The market is also adapting to emerging construction risks such as mass timber and modular building techniques, while appetite remains limited for coal mining, underground excavation, and dam projects due to heightened risk profiles.
In Australia, public and products liability insurance continues to stabilize in 2025. Despite ongoing competitive pressure from new entrants and insurers’ growth objectives, underwriting discipline remains strong. However, appetite for residential construction insurance is waning, driven by a rise in property damage claims linked to prefabricated materials.
Worker-to-worker injury claims are costly, averaging over AU$300,000 (approximately US$194,454), keeping insurer deductibles under close review. Additionally, bushfire-related risks and legal liability concerning “deemed manufacturer” status pose ongoing challenges in the Australian construction insurance market.
For businesses seeking effective protection, a clear insurance guide can help navigate the complexities of construction casualty policies and identify trustworthy insurance providers offering comprehensive business insurance coverage tailored to evolving project risks.
Related topic:
Insurance Development Forum Strengthens Focus on Climate Resilience with 2025–30 Strategy
Report: Soaring Housing and Insurance Costs Driving More Floridians to Leave the State
Singlife Unveils Singapore’s First Shared Personal Accident Insurance for Families
